<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweak Windows Firewall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://expertvista.com/2010/tweak-windows-firewall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://expertvista.com/2010/tweak-windows-firewall/</link>
	<description>Blog about design, art, security, and other good real and unreal stuff in life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 09:40:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://expertvista.com/2010/tweak-windows-firewall/#comment-13863</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://expertvista.com/?p=51#comment-13863</guid>
		<description>Thanks Astrum, great article!  It turns out that the problem that I was having was a result of creating the rule for the 64-bit version of iexplorer, when I really meant to create the rule for the 32-bit version of the browser, found in %ProgramFiles% (x86)\Internet Explorer.  Apparently, the two versions of the browser use different executables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Astrum, great article!  It turns out that the problem that I was having was a result of creating the rule for the 64-bit version of iexplorer, when I really meant to create the rule for the 32-bit version of the browser, found in %ProgramFiles% (x86)\Internet Explorer.  Apparently, the two versions of the browser use different executables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrum</title>
		<link>http://expertvista.com/2010/tweak-windows-firewall/#comment-13841</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 06:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://expertvista.com/?p=51#comment-13841</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is the same path, but please notice what I said about Avast web shield. Most probably you have a similar service within a security package where web traffic is filtered/directed by another process(es). You have to find it and create an according rule as well.
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is the same path, but please notice what I said about Avast web shield. Most probably you have a similar service within a security package where web traffic is filtered/directed by another process(es). You have to find it and create an according rule as well.<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://expertvista.com/2010/tweak-windows-firewall/#comment-13838</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://expertvista.com/?p=51#comment-13838</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m having some trouble getting these steps to work for IE 9.  After creating the new rule, I&#039;m unable to connect to the Internet.  IE 9 displays the error &quot;Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage.&quot;  However, if I allow all outbound connections not matching a rule to be made, IE 9 begins to work again.  Will the same program, %ProgramFiles%\Internet Explorer\iexplorer.com still work for IE 9?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having some trouble getting these steps to work for IE 9.  After creating the new rule, I&#8217;m unable to connect to the Internet.  IE 9 displays the error &#8220;Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage.&#8221;  However, if I allow all outbound connections not matching a rule to be made, IE 9 begins to work again.  Will the same program, %ProgramFiles%\Internet Explorer\iexplorer.com still work for IE 9?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

